openmolecules.org Forum: Bug Reports » > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0

Home » DataWarrior » Bug Reports » > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 [message #2105 is a reply to message #2102]

Sat, 20 January 2024 15:02

thomas
Messages: 731
Registered: June 2014

Senior Member

To mcmc: DataWarrior 6.0.0 should be compatible with earlier versions regarding the interpretation of numbers with modifiers like '>2000'. I tested your example (>2000, 55.6, 20) which correctly recognized the column as numerical. Thus, I assume there is something else fishy. Which OS do you use? Possibly the OS localization setting has some influence. Do you use decimal points '.' or ','? If I can reprodice, I may be able to update the numerical recognition circumvent the problem.

To Norvid: Many thanks for your comments on this. I could reproduce your phenomenon with writing into the 'test_property' column instead of the 'Calculated' column. This happened when clicking 'overwrite' twice. When changing the overwrite setting, DataWarrior was adapting the target column setting in a strange way: when choosing to overwrite, it hanged the setting to an existing column ('test_property' Wink

and when unchecking again, it was not updating the target column. It was also not perceiving that 'not to overwrite' an existing target column is not really compatible. I updated the behaviour to be more meaningful.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		> and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: mcmc on Thu, 11 January 2024 12:19
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: nbehrnd on Thu, 11 January 2024 23:42
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: mcmc on Fri, 12 January 2024 12:03
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: nbehrnd on Sat, 13 January 2024 20:18
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: mcmc on Wed, 17 January 2024 10:18
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: thomas on Sat, 20 January 2024 15:02
		> sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: mcmc on Tue, 30 July 2024 12:11
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: nbehrnd on Tue, 30 July 2024 19:31
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: mcmc on Wed, 31 July 2024 09:52
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: thomas on Wed, 31 July 2024 14:51
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: mcmc on Wed, 31 July 2024 17:50

Previous Topic:	Extract fragment
Next Topic:	Data warrior crash after Mac OS update

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Jul 06 11:58:31 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05194 seconds