| Re: Pentavalent carbonyl issue (urea formation?) [message #1942 is a reply to message #1941] |
Sat, 24 June 2023 16:53   |
thomas
Messages: 715
Registered: June 2014
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thank you for the files. To me it seems that your atom mapping is incorrect. The reactants fragments consisting out of a carbonyl group with attached bridge bond to nitrogen should not break bonding in the reaction, thus they should appear in the product the same way with the same mapping numbers. I have attached the updated macro file, which seems to work fine now.
The upper reaction shows your original mapping, the lower one shows the updated mapping:
[Updated on: Sat, 24 June 2023 16:54] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
