openmolecules.org

 
Home » DataWarrior » Cheminformatics » Assessing A Machine Learning Method's Predictivity
Assessing A Machine Learning Method's Predictivity [message #1523] Tue, 01 March 2022 13:56 Go to previous message
Christophe is currently offline  Christophe
Messages: 31
Registered: January 2022
Member
Hello everyone,

In the User Manual at the “Assessing A Machine Learning Method's Predictivity” part, I can read:

“The dataset is divided into ten fractions along the time axis. A model is build with the first fraction and used to predict the property of the second fraction's molecules. Then a second model is built from the first two fractions, which is then applied to predict the third fraction. This continues until the nineth model is built from the first nine fractions and used to predict the tenth and last fraction.”

When I apply this to a case, by clicking “Machine Learning” and then “Assess Prediction Quality” the nine linear regressions I get, “predicted vs observed”, each only contain one Time Id set of data !!!
For example if I split my data set into ten fractions according a Time Id column, I get 9 regression models containing for example prediction fraction 3 vs 2 ; 3 vs 3 ; 3 vs 4 … 3 vs 10

From the user manual I would expect “predicted vs observed” as 2 vs (3) then 2 vs (3+4) then 2 vs (3+4+5 …). Of course the number of data from the (3), (3+4) and (3+4+5…) set should equals the number contained into 2.
But in that case the differences with "use random fractions instead of time based ones" would go thinner from (3) to (3+...+9)

Did I miss something? For me, dividing the data set into 10 fractions along the time axis serves precisely to take account of batches that are very different from one another

All the best
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: retrosyntheis tools
Next Topic: ChemAxon calculated properties
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 22 00:21:49 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03828 seconds