openmolecules.org Forum: Bug Reports » > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0

Home » DataWarrior » Bug Reports » > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

> sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal [message #2254 is a reply to message #2097]

Tue, 30 July 2024 12:11

mcmc
Messages: 23
Registered: April 2018

Junior Member

Hello. Finally getting back to this issue now.
I am running 6.2.1 on my private PC now, and can reproduce half of the issue encountered earlier.
That is, the < and > signs are correctly interpreted, also without a whitespace in between.

However, two numbers in one cell, separated by nothing but a ; is not interpreted as numerical.

Started a fresh DW session and loaded the Wikipedia compounds.
Hovering over the Molweight column header, it nicely shows the values in there are numerical. This is still correct if I add '>' to the first value (image1).
However, if I add a second number to a molecular weight, without whitespace, the perceived data type changes to text (image2). Adding a space reverts it back to numerical (image 3).

I also attach the .dwar (only first 3 wiki compounds).

(the reason this is important to us, is that we use an in-house application that generates dwar files from our internal project SQL databases. If say an IC50 was measured more than once, each value is written into the dwar file separated by ';' without whitespace. We can of course change those scripts to include the whitespace, but we have hundreds of dwar files in circulation without the whitespace, that cannot be properly interpreted anymore by DW6).

[EDIT: 6.2.1 tested on Win11 Home 23H2. Initial report was with 6.0.0 on Win10 Pro, likely 22H2]

Attachment: image1.jpg
(Size: 8.27KB, Downloaded 48 times)
Attachment: image2.jpg
(Size: 9.17KB, Downloaded 67 times)
Attachment: image3.jpg
(Size: 10.08KB, Downloaded 58 times)
Attachment: Wikipedia_Compounds.dwar
(Size: 2.04KB, Downloaded 51 times)

[Updated on: Tue, 30 July 2024 13:44]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		> and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: mcmc on Thu, 11 January 2024 12:19
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: nbehrnd on Thu, 11 January 2024 23:42
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: mcmc on Fri, 12 January 2024 12:03
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: nbehrnd on Sat, 13 January 2024 20:18
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: mcmc on Wed, 17 January 2024 10:18
		Re: > and < signs not interpreted in 6.0.0 By: thomas on Sat, 20 January 2024 15:02
		> sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: mcmc on Tue, 30 July 2024 12:11
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: nbehrnd on Tue, 30 July 2024 19:31
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: mcmc on Wed, 31 July 2024 09:52
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: thomas on Wed, 31 July 2024 14:51
		Re: > sign properly interpreted, but '2;3' is interpreted as text, not numercal By: mcmc on Wed, 31 July 2024 17:50

Previous Topic:	Extract fragment
Next Topic:	Data warrior crash after Mac OS update

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 22 14:33:45 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04203 seconds